The distribution of individual cabinet positions in coalition governments: A sequential approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Multiparty government in parliamentary democracies entails bargaining over the payoffs of government participation, in particular the allocation of cabinet positions. While most of the literature deals with the numerical distribution of cabinet seats among government parties, this article explores the distribution of individual portfolios. It argues that coalition negotiations are sequential choice processes that begin with the allocation of those portfolios most important to the bargaining parties. This induces conditionality in the bargaining process as choices of individual cabinet positions are not independent of each other. Linking this sequential logic with party preferences for individual cabinet positions, the authors of the article study the allocation of individual portfolios for 146 coalition governments in Western and Central Eastern Europe. The results suggest that a sequential logic in the bargaining process results in better predictions than assuming mutual independence in the distribution of individual portfolios.
منابع مشابه
Coalition Governments, Cabinet Size, and the Common Pool Problem: Evidence from the German States
The theoretical literature on common pool problems in fiscal policy suggests that government fragmentation increases public expenditures. In parliamentary regimes, the fragmentation hypothesis refers to (i) coalition governments and (ii) cabinet size. This paper explores the effect of coalition governments and cabinet size on public expenditures with panel data covering all 16 German States ove...
متن کاملA Model of Endogenous Government Formation
Political parties bargain over the allocation of cabinet portfolios when forming coalition governments. Non-cooperative theories of legislative bargaining typically predict that the “formateur” enjoys a disproportionate share of government ministry positions. However, empirical evidence indicates that parties receive shares of portfolios proportional to their share of legislative seats that a g...
متن کاملExtension of the Portfolio Allocation Model to Surplus Majority Governments: a Theoretically Salient Case Study
Scholars have long studied the conditions under which the cabinet making process will result in minority, surplus majority, or minimum-winning governing coalitions in parliamentary systems. A recent contribution, Laver and Shepsle's portfolio allocation model, argues that surplus majority coalitions can only form when the number of salient policy dimensions in the political system is greater th...
متن کاملVoting Weights and Formateur Advantages in the Formation of Coalition Governments
We examine the relationship between parliamentary seats and cabinet posts in European governments between 1946 and 2001. Our speci ̄cation improves on past studies in two respects. First, it derives and uses the voting weights of the underlying coalition formation games. This reduces the measurement error introduced when seat shares are used to proxy for voting weights. Second, the statistical m...
متن کاملGovernment in Crisis: Opening the “Black Box” of Intra-Cabinet Competition Over Budgetary Allocation∗
With the onset of the current economic and financial crisis in Europe, questions about the power of core executives to control fiscal outcomes are more important than ever. Why are some governments more effective in controlling spending while others fall prey to excessive overspending by individual cabinet ministers? We approach this question by opening the “black box” of intra-cabinet decision...
متن کامل